Why is there no item.interact()

[Kenneh]

I understand that there is one in the inventory class, but that's pretty stupid considering that all the entities have interaction methods.

 

package org.kenneh.scripts;

import org.kenneh.api.script.PollingScript;
import org.osbot.script.ScriptManifest;
import org.osbot.script.rs2.model.Item;
import org.osbot.script.rs2.model.NPC;
import org.osbot.script.rs2.model.RS2Object;

import java.awt.*;

/**
 * Created by Kenneth on 5/1/2014.
 */

@ScriptManifest(
        name = "Test Script",
        author = "Kenneh",
        info = "For debugging purposes",
        version = 0.1
)
public class TestScript extends PollingScript {

    @Override
    public void onPaint(Graphics graphics) {
        final Graphics2D graphics2D = (Graphics2D) graphics;
        for(NPC npc : ctx.npcs.refresh().name("Chicken")) {
            if(npc != null && npc.isVisible()) graphics2D.draw(npc.getPosition().getPolygon(ctx.script.bot));
            try {
                npc.interact("asdfasdf");
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
        for(RS2Object obj : ctx.objects.refresh().name("Sack")) {
            if(obj != null && obj.isVisible()) graphics2D.draw(obj.getPosition().getPolygon(ctx.script.bot));
            try {
                obj.interact("asdfasdf");
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
        for(Item item : ctx.inventory.refresh().name("Feather")) {
            item.interact("asdfasdf"); // Okay, there is literally no reason for this not to exist.
        }
    }

    @Override
    public void start() {

    }

    @Override
    public int poll() {
        return 50;
    }
}

[Deffiliate]

http://osbot.org/api/org/osbot/script/rs2/ui/Inventory.html

 

Look at interactWithName(), id etc.

[FearMe]

I actually don't know why this doesn't exist when there's ItemDefinition. I've always found the Item class to be rather useless, lol.

[liverare]

Yeah, inefficient too. I hate the idea of needing to iterate twice to validate and interact, but there seems to be no other way because Item and ItemDefinition hold neither the index of the item or any methods that return the widget child the item belongs to. And that's why I like how I structured my shop api.

Edited May 1, 2014 by liverare

[Kenneh]

http://osbot.org/api/org/osbot/script/rs2/ui/Inventory.html

 

Look at interactWithName(), id etc.

 

How to know when someone didn't read the thread

 

Hopefully this will be fixed in v2.

 

Edit;

There isn't even an interactWithItem(), the Item class is literally useless

 

Edited May 1, 2014 by Kenneh

[Deffiliate]

How to know when someone didn't read the thread

 

Hopefully this will be fixed in v2.

 

Edit;

There isn't even an interactWithItem(), the Item class is literally useless

 

Sorry!

 

But I wouldn't say the Item class is useless. I just think that the Item class should at least be able to store the RSInterface child, which you could then interact with.

Yeah, inefficient too. I hate the idea of needing to iterate twice to validate and interact, but there seems to be no other way because Item and ItemDefinition hold neither the index of the item or any methods that return the widget child the item belongs to. And that's why I like how I structured my shop api.

Yo! Your solution may be to use 

and

[Dog_]

But I wouldn't say the Item class is useless. I just think that the Item class should at least be able to store the RSInterface child, which you could then interact with.

The inventory only has one Interface child.

[Deffiliate]

The inventory only has one Interface child.

Which has multiple grandchildren for each Item.... >.>

[Dog_]

Which has multiple grandchildren for each Item.... >.>

Incorrect, the InterfaceChild is 149, 0 and that child alone contains all the items. It's the same with equipment, store and deposit box. Bank and trade screen do have grandchildren for items though. Edited May 1, 2014 by Rawr

[liverare]

[ . . .]]

Yo! Your solution may be to use 

and

 

I suppose that would be a fine substitute. But I'd still want the Item class to store the item's slot index and have interaction method.