Disputed Member: https://osbot.org/forum/profile/38018-melomel/
Why it should be removed: Neutral: Neutral feedback is meant for trades that were successful but you are left unsatisfied with how the trade was completed. 
For example, if you were treated harshly during the trade or the item was not as described, feel free to warn other members of the seller/buyer's attitude or service by leaving neutral feedback.

Details: I never treated the user harshly "during" the service, i did the service what was asked for in the timeframe we had discussed, " I'm pretty sure he botted my account"  Accusations of botting which he has 0 proof. ( feel free to check my scripts repo to see if they was used)

Link to topic: https://osbot.org/forum/profile/103124-simple79001/?tab=node_feedback_Feedback

@melomel has been asked to respond here.

He's contacted me regarding this a few days ago. Did he ask you to provide screenshots of the whole service?

He did not verify before the order that he required screenshots but when asked I did provide 2 if my memory is correct, if required I'll post the skype logs 

46 minutes ago, Simple79001 said:

He did not verify before the order that he required screenshots but when asked I did provide 2 if my memory is correct, if required I'll post the skype logs 

Please do. 

I remain unsatisfied with this service, his responsiveness, the time completed, and his overall attitude. I have blocked him on skype after he pestered me for two days to leave him feedback, so when I told him why I didn't, he became aggressive with me and that was what prompted me to block him, and finally leave the feedback, so I no longer have access to his demeanor, language, or attitude. It was for the final aspects of his demeanor, language, and attitude that I had had enough, and didn't wish to take any more abuse. This is how I feel about your service- if your waiter or waitress gives you crappy service, barely comes to your table, doesn't fill your water even when you ask for it, are you gonna be pleased with the service? In this metaphor, I shouldn't be merely grateful that the waiter didn't eat my food while bringing it to me. I wouldn't recommend your service at all, and I find you to be a shady individual- I looked at your profile on another botting website, and there's nothing, similar to your status here- most all of your orders are chuckie, and while he has great things to say about you, I found you lazy at best, unprofessional and fraudulent at worst. You are a petulant child in your behavior, and what's the most laughable is that after abusing me with your words, I said "Fine, I'll write you a feedback" and you said iite like you thought you were actually getting something positive. I've purchased many services on this site- some average, some far above average, and you have set the bar at the lowest point. I considered many times recovering my account and forfeiting my payment just because your habits and actions were negligent and shady, i.e. odd hours with no response, character dying under your "hand-done" capabilities at sand crabs, and your deceptive quote for a time frame "Probably saturday, but tuesday at the latest" (completed late tuesday evening). You have your money, and I'm entitled to my feedback- whether you like it or not. 

Edited August 17, 20178 yr by melomel

Decode, I asked for your opinion on whether he was botting it or not, and never hear back from you. Regardless, even if you can say with certainty that he was NOT botting this service, I remain unsatisfied in its fulfillment.

1 minute ago, melomel said:

Decode, I asked for your opinion on whether he was botting it or not, and never hear back from you. Regardless, even if you can say with certainty that he was NOT botting this service, I remain unsatisfied in its fulfillment.

Can you post skype chat logs of the agreement as well as his behaviour that you're dissatisfied with. 

Also, as clearly shown there was no attempt of not providing proggies, you asked 3 times i supplied on 2 of these occasions, the 3rd i had logged off i even offered to log back on just to provide you with a proggy so why dont you cut out the bullshit

You know, fine- remove my feedback and I'll leave the following "Positive" feeback, "Didn't take my bank, completed the service- wouldn't recommend: lazy, flippant, careless, unsatisfactory. Altered the terms of our agreed upon terms immediately after transaction completion, then proceeded to alter the terms of our agreed upon methods a quarter of the way through the service." It reads better anyway.

8 hours ago, melomel said:

You know, fine- remove my feedback and I'll leave the following "Positive" feeback, "Didn't take my bank, completed the service- wouldn't recommend: lazy, flippant, careless, unsatisfactory. Altered the terms of our agreed upon terms immediately after transaction completion, then proceeded to alter the terms of our agreed upon methods a quarter of the way through the service." It reads better anyway.

He didn't really alter anything. He asked you, and you agreed to it. If you didn't want him using bolt racks, you could've just said no when he asked to use a karils bow at level 70.

 

As for the feedback, after skimming through all the proggies provided. He only failed to provide a proggy once, and that was because he was asleep. The other time he replied saying he had just logged out and if you wanted a proggy, he'd log back in, to which you ignored. As for your suspicion on him botting, i wouldn't say so myself. It took him his "latest" deadline to complete it, i think a botter would complete it a bit faster.

Feedback removed.