Polymorphism Posted April 14, 2017 Share Posted April 14, 2017 For what reason does OSBot not support playing on resizeable mode? I feel as though it's more bot like to play on fixed mode most of the time, but on resizeable when playing legit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Final Posted April 14, 2017 Share Posted April 14, 2017 I feel as though the bot should also vape so that it'd be similar to the rest of the player base. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polymorphism Posted April 14, 2017 Author Share Posted April 14, 2017 2 minutes ago, Final said: I feel as though the bot should also vape so that it'd be similar to the rest of the player base. And smoke weed to, since we're already doing something illegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Final Posted April 14, 2017 Share Posted April 14, 2017 8 minutes ago, Polymorphism said: For what reason does OSBot not support playing on resizeable mode? I feel as though it's more bot like to play on fixed mode most of the time, but on resizeable when playing legit. To answer the question, OSBot is limited in man power to make this happen, it's not first on the priority list for a currently one man development team. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polymorphism Posted April 14, 2017 Author Share Posted April 14, 2017 Just now, Final said: To answer the question, OSBot is limited in man power to make this happen, it's not first on the priority list for a currently one man development team. Didn't know it was one man, thought it was 2-3. That explains it very well actually. The only other reason I could imagine would be the see through/click through boxes -- the client would have to account for in game objects/npcs/etc being behind that an visible but not clickable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Final Posted April 14, 2017 Share Posted April 14, 2017 1 minute ago, Polymorphism said: Didn't know it was one man, thought it was 2-3. That explains it very well actually. The only other reason I could imagine would be the see through/click through boxes -- the client would have to account for in game objects/npcs/etc being behind that an visible but not clickable. No system with such little development resources is so easily prepared for expansion, especially when RS clients are constantly to competing to keep up with updates and content which may disturb the current code base. In an ideal world, it'd be an easy transition, but this isn't the case it seems. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irwtonrs1 Posted April 14, 2017 Share Posted April 14, 2017 14 minutes ago, Polymorphism said: I feel as though it's more bot like to play on fixed mode most of the time, but on resizeable when playing legit. Holy autism batman! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alek Posted April 14, 2017 Share Posted April 14, 2017 99% of the scripts would break because scripters dont listen to me about static ids (widgets). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polymorphism Posted April 14, 2017 Author Share Posted April 14, 2017 45 minutes ago, Alek said: 99% of the scripts would break because scripters dont listen to me about static ids (widgets). Why not reject any scripts that have static ids where another method is available to get the widget. I'd support the hell outta that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Final Posted April 14, 2017 Share Posted April 14, 2017 20 minutes ago, Polymorphism said: Why not reject any scripts that have static ids where another method is available to get the widget. I'd support the hell outta that Because we'd have no scripts or scripters. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polymorphism Posted April 14, 2017 Author Share Posted April 14, 2017 50 minutes ago, Final said: Because we'd have no scripts or scripters. Wish people weren't so stubborn and stuck in their ways to realize that sometimes..innovation means success.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
