Jump to content

Sam

Members
  • Posts

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by Sam

  1. We don't really need an IRC. The chat room does a good job, why do you want an IRC? 

     

    So you don't enjoy improvements? If something is good, you don't like making it better?

  2. I find the chat box really good how it is.

     

    I do not support this sorry.

    So you don't enjoy improvements? If something is good, you don't like making it better?

  3.  

     

    Not need to be honest. Wouldn't fix the looks of OSBot. wink.png

    wat

     

     

    I mean, It wouldn't fit the looks of OSBot. As im using animate. tongue.png

     

    Which IRC webclient are you talking about? There are many different themes...

  4. I think IRC should replace the current chat system we have now. It has all of the features of the current system plus a lot more benefits. It would take about ten minutes to set up a channel and switch systems.

     

    You can read about IRC here if you haven't already heard of it.

     

    Here is an implementation for IP.B.

    • Like 2
  5. Do you often ridicule people who don't understand concepts as well as you do? Is it something you enjoy? If they haven't visited a forum before, they might not know where/how to find something, or not realise that they should search before posting.

  6. It's because the GIF image you uploaded is too large. The server tries to resize it for you to make it smaller, but removes the other frames in the process.

     

    Use this to resize your animated GIF to 130 by 130px and then change your avatar to the smaller GIF.

  7.  

    Definitely. Signatures should be made much smaller, they're often distracting, invasive and cluttering. Personally I don't think there's any need for them at all, but that's a different argument.

    If they are so distracting then disable them. I personally like them.

    I have. Doesn't change the fact that they still exist and are annoying other people.

  8. LinkedList<NPC> valid = new LinkedList<NPC>();

    just a few tips

    you should use an ArrayList for this, LinkedLists use up too much memory, and it should be used if you were going to add and remove (LinkedLists are faster than ArrayLists for removing), in this case you were only adding.

     

    But ArrayList#add is O(n) worst case (when it has to resize) and LinkedList is constant time for adding.

     

    However if you're going to critique his List implementation of choice I think a far better suggestion would be for him to program to the interface not the implementation.

     

    @Cory, MethodContext should extend MethodProvider not Script (a MethodContext is not a script)

     

    By making the fields public in your MethodContext you have made your API brittle. What if you decide to make MethodContext thread-safe or perform additional checks before returning a field? You can't without breaking people's code. This is why encapsulation is important.

     

    I'm not sure why you named your package impl - what is it an implementation of?

     

    I would suggest documenting all your classes - I'm not sure what the ObstacleListener's purpose is.

     

    Those are my suggestions from a brief look. Hope it helps.

  9. Well it's not meant to be as important. If you are a Script Writer that has written high quality scripts, you will get the 'respect' that you deserve - you should be taken seriously through your reputation as a good programmer, not as someone who has the SW rank.

  10. This is a network problem, I doubt reinstalling anything will help you. It might be a bad internet connection, simply a slow response time from the OSBot server, or you possibly need to add an exception to your firewall.

  11. I agree with @YoHoJo, it seems unnecessary. The moderator rank(s) are already very noticeable down the bottom of the page with the online users. It just duplicates a feature already on the site and clutters up the forum.

  12.  

    It just creates elitism in the community. Take p****bot as an example - over there people often don't take others seriously who don't have the Scholar/Fellow rank when asking/answering questions.

    There's already plenty of this tbh, I was thinking more of Scripter/Official Scripter rather than Trial/Official.

     

    I think following StackExchange (StackOverflow) would be a better idea than a Scholar rank:

    • Everyone has a 'reputation'
    • You can increase someone's reputation if they post a good answer (requirement 10 posts to upvote)
    • You can decrease someone's reputation if they post something unhelpful/wrong (requirement 100 posts to downvote)
    • And so on.
  13. It just creates elitism in the community. Take powerbot as an example - over there people often don't take others seriously who don't have the Scholar/Fellow rank when asking/answering questions.

×
×
  • Create New...