notimportant1

bekeeper random broken

vouch, trustworthy seller

anyone vouch for this guy?

i still need this quest incase someones looking now

messaging u in pm

Dont know what price its worth so just let me know how much you want

Rarely completes even 10 min of running before bugging out (no error in log) Does not start again when stopped and restarted. I'd say take this off sdn.

Is it just me or does this version freeze alot more than previous ones? Other than that, good job!

pick flax

The bug list is building up, needs an update.

doesnt seem to run from evul chicken either, could be script ofc, dont know.

Thanks. But i think evil chicken is still bugged, from what i can see in the log (last line related to the death).

Great script! Love the fact that its free, keep up the good work.

Hmm, Kokeis last log in 1 week ago ..whats going on?

Its not you, i get the exact same error!

Hey Kokeis Your script has been working great so far, but now there seem to be something updated that makes it non functional in mage arena, it does not start at all. Please check it out and update if possible!

Hmm..i dont think so. What category do you suggest it should be in then?

Yes. I'm using i5-3570k 4bots same time and it uses 70-90% cpu which is much more than it should be. There haven't been any sigficant difference between latest osbot versions so far... Ahh another i5 user! So i must ask - have you tried to fiddle around with anything like programs, drivers, java, updates etc to try to make your i5 performance what it should be with OSbot? If you have tried something, but it didnt help, tell me that too because then i can scratch that from the list,

I have not tested .32 yet, but the performance was the same from .24 -.28. Currently running the bots on my older computer (7 tabs no lag on an old 3 ghz 4core amd), but i will test it with the .32 later tonight and post results.

This is your wording "I'm not offering you a solution to your issue; I'm offering you a solution that'd remove the issue your having. If you don't want to do that then that's fine." referring to that i should run multiple instances instead of multiple tabs in 1 instance, wich i posted that i have tested. I will tell you now, very simplified, for the third time so you can understand why you are NOT offering a solution that will remove my issue: When i run multitabs, 4 (FOUR) tabs, 1 (ONE) instance of OSbot, my CPU load is 95-99%, and the RAM usage is about 25% of total. When i run 1 (ONE) tab in each of 4 (FOUR) instances of OSbot, my CPU load is 95-99%, and the RAM usage is about 60% of total. Hence, your solution does NOT remove my issue wich is a too large cpu load, compared to a worse CPU. Please understand, i can not continue this wall bashing with you any longer.

Well the thing is (described it above) that i think that it should perform much better, based on the fact that i can run 7 tabs without lag on a cheaper and slower AMD processor (4 core 3.0 ghz)..... I have been testing the 2500k with some other programs, running multiple copies of them and its actually perfoming much better than my AMD at doing certain things, but when it comes to OSbot its just pure crap, so thats why im asking here if there might be a fix to this, like some drivers i should have, some operating system or anything else? OSbot is very good but nowhere near perfect. The issue is with OSbot not your hardware, use multiple instances of the client until OSbot is improved. Their is no other solution apart from this that is available to you. As i said above i tested running multiple clients of OSbots, instead of multiple tabs and that only increased the RAM usage, but did not lower CPU usage, so thats not a solution, Anyone else have any tips to try? I'm not offering you a solution to your issue; I'm offering you a solution that'd remove the issue your having. If you don't want to do that then that's fine. I told you, your suggestion does not solve the CPU load issue, its like you didnt even read my reply? Anyone ELSE have any suggestions to solve this?

Well the thing is (described it above) that i think that it should perform much better, based on the fact that i can run 7 tabs without lag on a cheaper and slower AMD processor (4 core 3.0 ghz)..... I have been testing the 2500k with some other programs, running multiple copies of them and its actually perfoming much better than my AMD at doing certain things, but when it comes to OSbot its just pure crap, so thats why im asking here if there might be a fix to this, like some drivers i should have, some operating system or anything else? OSbot is very good but nowhere near perfect. The issue is with OSbot not your hardware, use multiple instances of the client until OSbot is improved. Their is no other solution apart from this that is available to you. As i said above i tested running multiple clients of OSbots, instead of multiple tabs and that only increased the RAM usage, but did not lower CPU usage, so thats not a solution, Anyone else have any tips to try?

Well the thing is (described it above) that i think that it should perform much better, based on the fact that i can run 7 tabs without lag on a cheaper and slower AMD processor (4 core 3.0 ghz)..... I have been testing the 2500k with some other programs, running multiple copies of them and its actually perfoming much better than my AMD at doing certain things, but when it comes to OSbot its just pure crap, so thats why im asking here if there might be a fix to this, like some drivers i should have, some operating system or anything else?

Please go into further details if you can help me fix this?

I will test it, but the thing is I'm able to run 8 tabs on a technically WORSE cpu and graphics card with the same amount of lag as 4 tabs on this "technically" better cpu, wich makes me think is is CPU related. Keep the ideas coming. Update: i just tried running 4 .exes instead of 4 tabs, but the CPU is still at 95-99% usage. (Also this method use about twice as much RAM wich in my case doesnt matter, but doesnt help either). Man, im really disappointed with this piece of shit i5 2500k! Lol...