thepecher

I pretty sure jagex knows chaos druids are getting botted lol

How so? PS: 15 minutes strong!

EDIT: 30 minutes in, looks as if it is going to stay

ofc ofc... But hes was just getting alot of comments saying " do this /do that" and so i thought i'd cheer him up

Nice little project there! (btw don't listen to the others, you have to learn somewhere)

Nice build,does it have mith gloves?

RIP "ffs"

Welcome to osbot

Can't wait for webwalking and what that is gonna bring

Contacted you 2 people add me the1and.only.pecher

You forget windows xp has no support any more like osbot 1 will not have anymore in a couple of weeks. Like with windows xp alot of application don't support it anymore and microsoft don't update windows xp to work with them. So everything you just said is false

So you want info about bans,i'll share my info about all my bans i've gotten so far? In my opinion the only thing they detect is the general behaviour of the account. I have never been banned on an account that has quest/ other skills etc done on it. I only got banned on 99 wc accounts while goldfarming or f2p clay miners. I think the key is not to make an account that is so obvious. You see, when you are playing legit often you see a player in the world and you can immidiatly say "Yep, that's a bot". If we can do that, jagex can. The days of 30+ accounts on gdk wearing same outfit are over. I think the most noticable things are: -Combat level -Other skills (level up other skills and not only the skill you are botting) -Do other stuff on the account. -Quests ( i think this is so important, i've never been banned on a account that was recently questing NEVER) That is what i like to call "the macro anti botting system" the "micro anti botting system" would be related to: -Repetetive actions -walking -Mouse algorithms - script quality (getting stuck etc) - randoms(i think this is minimal, i fail more randoms while playing legit than when botting) I don't think jagex records all that data for all it's players (imagine the data size) so i think the "Macro system" is the important part and often overlooked.

"Their scripts on osbot 2" Did you buy a script on osbot 2?? (Because no, osbot 1 script != osbot 2 script). You have no right to ask/demand lifetime script support on a different script you didn't even buy. If the scripter decides to port over their script and give out free copies then so be it but don't try to oblige all scripters to do the same. Now once and for all: You bought a script with a "One time fee" (again, one time fee != lifetime). Scripts are provided as is, A scripter could very well decide not to update a script for a rs update and you would get no refund. You buy a script which is a piece of code that is written to work with a certain version of runescape. Often the scripters decide to update the script to please it's customers and attract new one but he is not obliged to do that. Same thing here for osbot 2. You bought a script for a certain version of runescape on a certain version of the bot client. If either get's an update the scripter is not obliged to update and please you (the customer) in any way or provide you with access to the a new piece of code. I'd say you should be gratefull you even get free 30 day trial... Now please understand you are only making this harder for yourself. You are inventing rights you do not have and try to circumvent the inevitable. You will lose support to scripts you bought because software ugraded. It's like buying a windows xp and demanding a free copy of windows 8 when it comes out

Welcome to OsBot!

OMAGAWD NO WAI

everyone knows the future is in flax picking and lobster fishing in f2p!!! what a joke thread

Dude get over it, Osbot 2 is going to happen no matter how much you argue with us... You lose some money we lose alot of time everyone needs to tip in a little

this^

Wait are you really asking for a full refund on scripts you have used for months and probably goldfarmed x100 your investement. To me you sound more like the pathetic one...

#neverForget

From my fp2 clay miner: (inb4 "naming conventions!!!, i know...) and thx to Swizz for the part on getting the current rock if(!client.getMyPlayer().isAnimating() && rock !=null){ if(mineSpot.contains(myPlayer())){ rock.interact("Mine",false,0,false); } else { rock.interact("Mine"); } currentRock = rock; sleep(random(1500,1800)); } else { RS2Object rock2; Position myPosition = myPlayer().getPosition(); switch (myPlayer().getRotation()) { case 0: //SOUTH rock2 = getRockAtPosition(new Position(myPosition.getX(), myPosition.getY() - 1, 0)); break; case 511: case 512: //WEST case 513: rock2 = getRockAtPosition(new Position(myPosition.getX() - 1, myPosition.getY(), 0)); break; case 1023: case 1024: //NORTH case 1025: rock2 = getRockAtPosition(new Position(myPosition.getX(), myPosition.getY() + 1, 0)); break; case 1535: case 1536: //EAST case 1537: rock2 = getRockAtPosition(new Position(myPosition.getX() + 1, myPosition.getY(), 0)); break; default: rock2 = currentRock; break; } if (!rock2.equals(currentRock)){ walk(mineArea); } }

That isn't our choice, most of the scripters were against the release and work on osbot 2 and wanted to keep osbot 1 as the main client. Now we are forced to do alot of work (porting,scripting) without any return and the customers will have to pay again. Don't bash on the scripters, in the end this whole thing is coming from the stuborness of some developers that wanted that osbot 2 really became a thing (if the same time that was invested in osbot 2 was invested in osbot 1 the client would be equally good)

Boom you see @Nitrousek told ya!

Well fuck you too

Try declaring planksCreated as long