alphaDesign

I'll do it for quite cheap; alphaDesign.contact

secure-runescape l2phish

Ctrl + click on the layer you want to paint (the thumbnail) + colour it with a brush?

I don't listen to this kind of music, but the picture in the second video is amazing.

I see no reason why on earth would he get his rank removed, after all the time spent on here, helping the community and whatnot.

Your rationality is amazingly enlightening. Sadly you have not passed the 3rd grade, it's unfortunate, isn't it. This reply is rhetorical, don't bother replying.

Reread that post, I've edited it. You're getting a bit more pathetic here. You said that you're rational and yet you copied me the official, politically correct and the modern, cultural Marxist definition of art. Come on, hypocrisy. The last part: Yes, that would be art, according to you. Not me. You're failing it again. Yeah, like what?

Are you the retarded one? As well as illiterate? Let me add some brackets for your easier understanding, seeing that you can not understand basic sentences. (I do not care) (about) (your) (official definition). I didn't say: (I do not care) (about) (your official definition). Or is that a bit too hard to understand as well. Well, you've just made a fool out of yourself, skipping grades is never a good decision. That, apparently, had an impact of your understanding of art as well.

I don't care about your 'official' and politically correct definitions. And of course you had to call me retarded over that, even though you're the one who calls all of this art. This is as much as art as is programming. Some call the source code an art. Sure. According to your enterpretation of art, it may be. According to your interpretation, however, a faeces on a paper is art as well. Go figure. Art is far more than just a creation of something visual. What's next, will you provide me official definition of 'love' and 'happiness' or such? Also, let me add something. You do not make art because you are bored. I never said that, you're twisting my words. I understand that it takes skill to produce design. I have been into design for several years, I know the situation. But just because it takes skill, patience and whatnot it still does not make it art. You may consider yourself and the rest of us as artists. Do so, I do not. My definition of art is far more than just some visual production and presentation.

By the way, you stated in the thread title you made 'art'. I can't be offensive to anyone as I do GFX as well, but we are not artists. What we do is not art. It's graphical design. Art is something far more than just this.

What do you mean? Do you want all the stats to be in the same x coord line?

Have you made the background yourself? Because if not, render + background + set some blending styles + erase the edges = done, right?

I'll go for it, for sure.

Would you like the psd?

I know, I've been messing around with the save for web, or rather, gif settings for a bit to find out the best ones. I do assume you're using the maximum, 256 colours, right? While I do believe that, I am not sure about your dither and the other settings which are located on the right of the dither, they do not have a name/title. However, I am not sure about the whole settings in the CS2. Also, are you not using AE for the animation? These are my settings on the lower resolution files anyway, I tend to mess with the settings a bit when doing the bigger ones due to, well, the dither. I am not positive how these settings look like in the CS2 & if you are using this very method, but I hope I can help you as much as I can with this very situation.

I don't think you saw my previous work, though. And I most certainly am not a hater, it's called constructive criticism. And by bad quality I mean the dither, I'm not sure whether you're blind or I am seeing things, but the gif is most certainly not high quality. Once again, the gif, not the render and whatnot.

Honestly don't like it. The glare speed is far too fast & too solid, use some fast blur, maybe even too frequent. The quality itself is pretty bad as well.

Voted for 5th.

Alright, thanks. Even though I have no idea where is the inner glow used, supposedly across the whole website.

Glows? Almost every single element has a shadow, glow would not fit, I assure you. As for the bevels, I do not use them, they simply do not look good, in my opinion. And for the gradients, I've used them where ever I could, you have to keep in mind that it's far easier to do this in the Photoshop than exporting it into CSS and html and could not really overdo the gradients, simply due to that.

May I ask you what would you do to make it less bland? And how is that going to benefit the whole layout?

Indeed, the page is there only for the sake of original quality. Thanks. I used vast majority of the grey due to the forum theme (Of course, excluding the header). As for the blandness, I always idealize such pages as simple and elegant and that would be the reason for it.

Visit the live page: http://tilenk.byethost7.com/index.php.html Preview image: If anyone is heavily interested for the psd, I might share it, depends on what are you going to use it for.

I have no idea, honestly. I have just used the image he provided in the thread where Designer asked for the idea.