Have You contacted me either through Osbot or Skype?: No - Skype is Osbot.route66
Quest/Service Required: Waterfall Quest
Money/Items for quest provided?: Will Discuss
Do You agree to the TOS?: Yes

Have You contacted me either through Osbot or Skype?: No - Skype is Osbot.route66

Quest/Service Required: Waterfall Quest

Money/Items for quest provided?: Will Discuss

Do You agree to the TOS?: Yes

add my skype

is this service botted or by hand? would be interested in some levelling

is this service botted or by hand? would be interested in some levelling

by hand unless i state otherwise

talking on skype

talking on skype

confirmed talking to me regarding 1-52 hunter

EDIT: 

Spoke on skype, said that I needed a service done by hand and not botting as I have a previous bot busting offence.

 

 

Bassline: "if it was banned for a botting offence when the service was specifically by hand, it should be the service provider held responsibleas"

 

[14:04] Harry Grewall: 

 

<<<" then no bans should occur

if it does then aint my fault"

 

I think that if a service says specifically by hand and the servicer provider reassures the buyer that it is to be done by hand, that the service provider SHOULD be responsible should there be a bot related ban. If I got the service and it took 3 days, and when I go to log in after service finished it instantly logs me out saying acc disabled for bot busting, how is that not the service provider's responsibility, as it would be obvious that they have used a bot?

Something to think about.

Edited June 18, 201411 yr by bassline

 

EDIT: 

Spoke on skype, said that I needed a service done by hand and not botting as I have a previous bot busting offence.

 

 

Bassline: "if it was banned for a botting offence when the service was specifically by hand, it should be the service provider held responsibleas"

 

[14:04] Harry Grewall: 

 

<<<" then no bans should occur

if it does then aint my fault"

 

I think that if a service says specifically by hand and the servicer provider reassures the buyer that it is to be done by hand, that the service provider SHOULD be responsible should there be a bot related ban. If I got the service and it took 3 days, and when I go to log in after service finished it instantly logs me out saying acc disabled for bot busting, how is that not the service provider's responsibility, as it would be obvious that they have used a bot?

Something to think about.

 

gtfo thread , you said if you cause an offence is it your fault? not specifying about botting you idiot.

Im not trying to slander your thread, believe me just giving people a heads up. I said if it is a bot offence or macro and you said that you still wouldnt be responsible. as soon as I said what I said above, instead of coming to a negotiation, you just deleted me off skype haha mature way to run a service, anyway, good luck and have a great day

 

to reiterate the point you just said about didnt say about bot?
 

Bassline: "if it was banned for a botting offence when the service was specifically by hand, it should be the service provider held responsibleas"

 

[14:04] Harry Grewall: 

 

<<<" then no bans should occur

if it does then aint my fault"

 

Edited June 18, 201411 yr by bassline