We still get updates from it from time to time. But when none of our bots are running into issues, it's generally assumed to be functional. If you've written a script, then you know how users can somehow report issues that don't really exist. Hence, why we only check from time to time and check if it correlates with other findings.

2arrogant4me.

 

But seriously, just because something works perfectly fine for you, and a select group of small people you choose to listen to, doesn't mean that there aren't legitimate issues occurring for others.

 

Anyway, keep up the good work, and keep working on fixing randoms and making them perfect, in my opinion, that's the only major flaw with OSBOT at the moment, imperfect random support.

Edited February 25, 201411 yr by Purpose

2arrogant4me.

 

But seriously, just because something works perfectly fine for you, and a select group of small people you choose to listen to, doesn't mean that there aren't legitimate issues occurring for others.

 

Anyway, keep up the good work, and keep working on fixing randoms and making them perfect, in my opinion, that's the only major flaw with OSBOT at the moment, imperfect random support.

 

We do listen, but obviously we can't listen to everyone. At least I'm being truthful about it and saying it instead of hiding behind political speeches. It's not arrogance as much as acknowledging limits and prioritizing. Does the President of the US read every message that's sent to him? No, it's filtered tremendously. Same thing here. We prioritize and openly admit it. The only people that should have problems with it are the immature people who have yet to realize that life is all about prioritizing, or just don't know that this type of stuff happens everywhere.

Anyways, we listen to the most reliable providers of information that we can find, which usually happens to be scripters. They do get feedback from users on things, including randoms, and if they have issues with it, then we also hear about it. But if it's limited to some reports that have not been confirmed by known trusthworthy sources, then they may not have even bothered to forward it on and there is little point in spending resources on it. That's especially true when our own bots are telling us that there are no problems. Even if we did get reports, our bots are working fine, so there is no way to fix an issue that doesn't exist for us. If they were confirmed/collaborated reports, then sure, we'll see if we can try to get that specific random, but otherwise, it's not worth the effort.

 

Sorry I burst your bubble on how everyone is treated perfectly equally in life, but someone had to do it eventually.

i do around 10 hours a day dont usally have problems