its not the greatest. AMD Is really bad

AMD aren't bad, no clue where your getting that opinion from.

 

Yeah the AMD isn't too good on that computer, but like they said for the price it's completely fine.

 

 

lol that's a terrible deal don't ever buy a hd6670 unless you're going to crossfire it with the a10-5800k apu

The A10 series is only good if your going to use it for your APU so I can already tell you know nothing.

 

amd sucks. always intel/nvidia.

What? The 8350 beast of a card, not as good slightly worse than the i7 3770k (which was it's competitor) and it costs nearly half the price; how can you complain about that? Also, why is nvidia shitting themselves about AMD's official new card release next month code named hawaii? The last time AMD released high end cards was in 2011 and even to date the cards compare to some of the best consumer grade nvidea's (they also dominate the low end and business markets) imagine what their new series will be like. Leaked results (using early drivers, imagine when the drivers are finished) of one of the high end cards beat the titan and it costs $600.

Expect nothing spectacular from AMD BUT expect them to wipe the floor with nvidea (their high end cards will be better than the nvidea cards and I'm sure AMD will continue to dominate other sections of the market)!

If you seriously follow hardware you should know that AMDs new cards are really anticipated. The only let down AMD have done this year so far is with the 9000 series of cpu's.

 

8350 competes with 3570k... and falls behind most of the time.

i do agree that amd's GPU's are great, though. But they certainly don't "wipe the floor" with nvidia.

 

Look it up online, with practical applications the 8350 falls just behind a 3770k but when running benchmarks it's score is more comparable to a 3570k. I don't need to explain it when you can look up the facts.

 

Wut.. the 7970 which was released in 2011 is 10% averaged out worse than the 770 while still costing less, nuff said? Their new series will defo wipe the floor with nvidea's current series. Their is a lot of reasons why theirs a huge hype over AMDs cards atm. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2049397/amd-unveils-hawaii-generation-of-gpus.html

 http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/167309-radeon-r9-290x-hardware-specs-and-benchmarks-of-amds-titan-killer-leaked

Edited September 26, 201312 yr by Fringie

 

 

 

its not the greatest. AMD Is really bad

AMD aren't bad, no clue where your getting that opinion from.

 

Yeah the AMD isn't too good on that computer, but like they said for the price it's completely fine.

 

 

lol that's a terrible deal don't ever buy a hd6670 unless you're going to crossfire it with the a10-5800k apu

The A10 series is only good if your going to use it for your APU so I can already tell you know nothing.

 

amd sucks. always intel/nvidia.

What? The 8350 beast of a card, not as good slightly worse than the i7 3770k (which was it's competitor) and it costs nearly half the price; how can you complain about that? Also, why is nvidia shitting themselves about AMD's official new card release next month code named hawaii? The last time AMD released high end cards was in 2011 and even to date the cards compare to some of the best consumer grade nvidea's (they also dominate the low end and business markets) imagine what their new series will be like. Leaked results (using early drivers, imagine when the drivers are finished) of one of the high end cards beat the titan and it costs $600.

Expect nothing spectacular from AMD BUT expect them to wipe the floor with nvidea (their high end cards will be better than the nvidea cards and I'm sure AMD will continue to dominate other sections of the market)!

If you seriously follow hardware you should know that AMDs new cards are really anticipated. The only let down AMD have done this year so far is with the 9000 series of cpu's.

 

8350 competes with 3570k... and falls behind most of the time.

i do agree that amd's GPU's are great, though. But they certainly don't "wipe the floor" with nvidia.

 

Look it up online, with practical applications the 8350 falls just behind a 3770k but when running benchmarks it's score is more comparable to a 3570k. I don't need to explain it when you can look up the facts.

 

Wut.. the 7970 which was released in 2011 is 10% averaged out worse than the 770 while still costing less, nuff said? Their new series will defo wipe the floor with nvidea's current series. Their is a lot of reasons why theirs a huge hype over AMDs cards atm. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2049397/amd-unveils-hawaii-generation-of-gpus.html

 http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/167309-radeon-r9-290x-hardware-specs-and-benchmarks-of-amds-titan-killer-leaked

 

 

both are worth the watch...

 

Also im not sure where you thought i was bashing the 7970(or the 770?), but they really are about the same.

 

and you do realize that the 770 is just a 680 with a newer pcb right?

 

also it's hard to tell from this point in time whether the new cards will "wipe the floor" with the 780 or titan because they aren't even out yet, and as far as i can tell nobody outside amd has gotten their hands on them. if you do find a review though please send me the link for i am interested.

 

 

 

 

its not the greatest. AMD Is really bad

AMD aren't bad, no clue where your getting that opinion from.

 

Yeah the AMD isn't too good on that computer, but like they said for the price it's completely fine.

 

 

lol that's a terrible deal don't ever buy a hd6670 unless you're going to crossfire it with the a10-5800k apu

The A10 series is only good if your going to use it for your APU so I can already tell you know nothing.

 

amd sucks. always intel/nvidia.

What? The 8350 beast of a card, not as good slightly worse than the i7 3770k (which was it's competitor) and it costs nearly half the price; how can you complain about that? Also, why is nvidia shitting themselves about AMD's official new card release next month code named hawaii? The last time AMD released high end cards was in 2011 and even to date the cards compare to some of the best consumer grade nvidea's (they also dominate the low end and business markets) imagine what their new series will be like. Leaked results (using early drivers, imagine when the drivers are finished) of one of the high end cards beat the titan and it costs $600.

Expect nothing spectacular from AMD BUT expect them to wipe the floor with nvidea (their high end cards will be better than the nvidea cards and I'm sure AMD will continue to dominate other sections of the market)!

If you seriously follow hardware you should know that AMDs new cards are really anticipated. The only let down AMD have done this year so far is with the 9000 series of cpu's.

 

8350 competes with 3570k... and falls behind most of the time.

i do agree that amd's GPU's are great, though. But they certainly don't "wipe the floor" with nvidia.

 

Look it up online, with practical applications the 8350 falls just behind a 3770k but when running benchmarks it's score is more comparable to a 3570k. I don't need to explain it when you can look up the facts.

 

Wut.. the 7970 which was released in 2011 is 10% averaged out worse than the 770 while still costing less, nuff said? Their new series will defo wipe the floor with nvidea's current series. Their is a lot of reasons why theirs a huge hype over AMDs cards atm. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2049397/amd-unveils-hawaii-generation-of-gpus.html

 http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/167309-radeon-r9-290x-hardware-specs-and-benchmarks-of-amds-titan-killer-leaked

 

 

both are worth the watch...

 

Also im not sure where you thought i was bashing the 7970(or the 770?), but they really are about the same.

 

and you do realize that the 770 is just a 680 with a newer pcb right?

 

also it's hard to tell from this point in time whether the new cards will "wipe the floor" with the 780 or titan because they aren't even out yet, and as far as i can tell nobody outside amd has gotten their hands on them. if you do find a review though please send me the link for i am interested.

 

I guess you don't really know too much then do you .

 

The r9 290x nickname is the 'titan killer' if you weren't aware and amd have released details etc. As I said look it up yourself.

 

The 770 is quieter, requires less power etc and is slightly better but costs a lot more.

 

The 770 uses the GK104 architecture but everything else is completely different, it has less cudacores etc but since it's using more recent technologies it performs neck and neck with a 680.

 

AMD have been releasing details about the card this week. As I said look it up yourself.

builded own computer

So just pointing this out there, but AMD's graphics department in run by ATI

i run league at 70-80 fps on my 2 year old shitty laptop

If you build your own you simply will save your self a ton of money while allowing you to spend more into parts. Not saying you have, but if you ever buy  a computer at a retail store go ahead and just burn the money instead, it'll save you the heartache.

No...Just no...this is an extremely outdated build.  You could build nice budget build for the same price that would be way better than that computer.

it's "ok" for it's price.
I would recommend building your own, to get the very most for your money.
Recommend waiting for January sale as well.

1-amd gross

2-playable on LoL