Oliver Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Ehh I don't think there should really be a time limit to be honest. From your example, you could say that the user purposefully split up the feedbacks to give him multiple feedbacks, in which that case I wouldn't really agree with it and I would remove it. However, if lets say you sell me a bond for 1.2m or whatever, I leave you feedback, then 10 minutes later I want to buy 20m gold, I should be able to give you a feedback on both if you get what I mean. Wheres the difference if i buy a freshie. get another order to create a (as example GDK) okay i see need another freshie. Then i see oh my mule account runs out of membership, better buy a bond. ? Why should there be no multiple FB be given? You see this are different trades with always a risk of 1,2-1,5m / 3$. The rule says to feedback there must be a risk at least of 1$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 7, 2014 Author Share Posted April 7, 2014 Wheres the difference if i buy a freshie. get another order to create a (as example GDK) okay i see need another freshie. Then i see oh my mule account runs out of membership, better buy a bond. ? Why should there be no multiple FB be given? You see this are different trades with always a risk of 1,2-1,5m / 3$. The rule says to feedback there must be a risk at least of 1$. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you did anything wrong. I'm just saying we need to rethink our rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oliver Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you did anything wrong. I'm just saying we need to rethink our rules. yes i know! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanhon Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 yes i know! agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilgad Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Whoa whoa chill out, we aren't accusing anyone of anything, we're just brainstorming ideas about the system. If that were the case I would just set up a system with my buddy and buy something new every 5 minutes to get him to 100 feedback real quick lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 7, 2014 Author Share Posted April 7, 2014 Whoa whoa chill out, we aren't accusing anyone of anything, we're just brainstorming ideas about the system. If that were the case I would just set up a system with my buddy and buy something new every 5 minutes to get him to 100 feedback real quick lol.That's my point. It's technically allowed at the moment... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolmanden Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 Really hard to satisfy both party of suggestions. I'd say just put it to 6 hour time-limit if same member. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartiiinnOSRS Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 I highly support this, people have post called number 1 bond seller yet they have 25 fb you should be able to say stuff that aren't true I highly support this, people have post called number 1 bond seller yet they have 25 fb you should be able to say stuff that aren't true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 30, 2014 Author Share Posted April 30, 2014 I highly support this, people have post called number 1 bond seller yet they have 25 fb you should be able to say stuff that aren't true I highly support this, people have post called number 1 bond seller yet they have 25 fb you should be able to say stuff that aren't true What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartiiinnOSRS Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 What? there are people that sell bonds and write " [#1 bond seller]" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted May 1, 2014 Author Share Posted May 1, 2014 there are people that sell bonds and write " [#1 bond seller]"Ok... But I don't get how that's relevant to this thread. O.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawsZ Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 (edited) dont set a time limit in the system lol just moderate it manually i guess. Edited May 15, 2014 by BawsZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted May 15, 2014 Author Share Posted May 15, 2014 dont set a time limit in the system lol just moderate it manually i guess. Moderate it how? People can just do continuous trades since there's no time limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Maldesto Posted May 15, 2014 Administrator Share Posted May 15, 2014 dont set a time limit in the system lol just moderate it manually i guess. OR give your feedback when you do the trade. Stop being lazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 I think you shouldn't receive feedback after 50 feedback, people just do minimal trades such as bonds, eventually they get trust and then scamquit While if you limit it to 50 - people will just sell goods that make good money, instead of just trying to get respects /instead of feedback you would have a 'amount' section which you would put the amount the trade was worth in USD Allowing the best quality over quantity sellers to gain their rightful respects with $100 + trades - pretty pointless though but I just wanted to suggest it because people who have quantity over quality really piss me off - doing this would increase the profit margins in things like bonds, so the real sellers actually earn more money //////// Also have the USD total traded and have a hiscores for that/ or as well as feedback \\\\ While also having a hiscores for single trade worth as someone with $500 + sent via paypal without a chargeback obviously deserves respects Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
