Jump to content

Strange_Fk

Trade With Caution
  • Posts

    90
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by Strange_Fk

  1. Try deleting your current osbot(2.4.74) and then re downloading from the forums. (This has just fixed this issue for me, although have had issue a bit more than usual lately and sometimes that won't fix)

     

    If that does not work, try going a step further and deleting the current version, plus go into your OSBot folder, copy the "Scripts" folder, and then within the "Local" folder, copy the file named "accounts" (don't share the accounts file with anyone, as it contains username/email and password combos to all saved accounts you use in OSBot). Finally delete the whole "OSBot" folder, then try downloading it fresh from this site.

     

    Obviously go back and replace your Scripts folder, as well as the accounts file if needed.

     

    Hope this helps man.

     


    1. OSBot Version (do NOT put "current version", be specific) 2.4.74

    2. A description of the issue. Include relevant logs. Webwalking not working at all.  174a7efb893c371f36beb60e1e26173f.png

    3. Are you receiving any errors in the client canvas or the logger? 

    4. How can you replicate the issue?

    5. Has this issue persisted through multiple versions? If so, how far back? Not what i know. Noticed it a few hours ago.

  2. A few weeks ago I started botting and got a 2 days ban, so I stopped botting on that acc.

    Some days later I made a new acc and started botting on that one and today i got Perm ban on it.

    Does this mean that im "flagged" now?

    What should I do?

    Any chance for me keep botting without getting perm banned immediately in the future?

    If your question is can you prevent perm ban on first offense, then the answer is no. I feel like 2 day bans are rare now.

  3. There's the solution. Mirror mode isn't helping at all. It's a placebo effect making you think it actually works. If you have your own private scripts you should be more than okay and that's sufficiently enough.

     

    By the way you're not VIP. You can't use mirror mode any longer.

    I was getting massive ban rates using stealth mode with my private scripts(which I was constantly debugging and adding stuff to the script) up until mirror mode. So its either mirror mode or the updates that kept me from getting ban, but my VIP is currently done, so I will test the same script using stealth to see if in fact it was mainly mirror mode, or my script preventing a ban. With my current account im on 1 att 77 str 1 def 52 range 52 mage 7 cooking, rest of stats are level 1. Botted every straight from tut island (except the 7 cooking, I got that just to test eating wasn't buggy in my script).

  4. Awesome!

     

    I'll definitely check mirror mode out at some point like I said earlier, it seems that many people have had success with it.

     

    Thanks a bunch!

     

    Wow, straight off tut island? It's crazy you still haven't been banned then. Nice work!

     

    With posts like these, I think it will definitely be worth my time to check out mirror mode.

     

    Thanks a lot my man!

    Yeah buddy, although I run all my bots straight off tut island lmfao. I use my own scripts however, but I'm not a crazy scripter, but they run nicely. Only reason why I gave mirror mode a try is because I started getting picked up quicker than usual, so just bought VIP this past month. The forums online are pretty misleading and almost didn't buy it because of all the negativity around it. Glad I did though tbh. On the other hand I could just be on a lucky streak though... but I doubt it

  5. Yes! It does help with ban rates! I've used it for months now and my accounts are running solid! 

    Agreed, it has for me as well. Forums are full of controversy around whether or not mirror mode helps or not, but  I haven't been ban since buying VIP. Definitely worth testing the waters for a month. If you are gold farming and not botting a signle account at a time, then you should probably stick to stealth injection, as mirror mode takes up more CPU power. Good luck, and feel free to message me with any questions.

     

    Oh and my account now has been botted straight off tut island, with no exp in anything but str, mage, range, and hp. It is 1 att 77 str and kills men n loots herbies for money. Not a single ban yet

    • Like 1
  6. Mirror mode has definitely been worth it for me. Although it could be all luck of the draw, but I decided to try mirror mode out after receiving bans quicker than usual. So far it has been great and haven't received a ban since (only bot one account at the moment, but was getting ban before fairly quick doing same method). The bot had even survived approx 3-5 hours of walking back and forth due to a bug in my script, and somehow still no ban. Just thought I'd throw this out there, mainly because I was skeptical about mirror mode before trying it out myself (mainly due to the mixed reviews seen online).

     

    So far I'm lovin' it doooe

  7. Wasn't sure how or where to post this. But just had to create me second account,

    i've been using the script Precise AIO cows which I payed for, I run it for roughly

    2-3 hrs during the day, and at night for maybe 3-5 hours consecutively, my first account

    lasted a few days and then was disabled, my second account was disabled after the first

    night... I see people on the forums talking about how they have a script run time of 19hrs+

    and they're fine. 

     

    So, in short, I've had 2 consecutive bans with the same script in two days.

    How come I'm getting banned so fast; what can I do to not get banned? Figured

    paying for a script would ensure that wouldn't happen.. Thanks let me know.

    I use my own personal scripts and can tell you for fact that where you bot deifnitely makes a major impact.

     

    I tried using my script for cows/cowhides, accounts would get ban before I even came close to a day of botting.

     

    Meanwhile using same script I was able to get 78 strength 47 range 47 mage all ftp botted straight off tut island (not at cows of course), with no ban.

    The 78 str was using bronze sword and wooden shield too hahahaha

     

    EDIT: In other words... don't bot ftp cows, unless maybe, just maybe, you have a reallllllly realllllllly good private script. Even though, your odds at cows are slim my friend.

  8. Now I've been running it I don't think so lol!

    Hahahahah yeah, I read a long time ago that it had been removed because they saw it as pointless, due to the fact that most bots would handle this random event, while actual players who afk would lose out and not handle the random at all. RSWiki also confirmed it has been taken out.

     

    Wanted to say that from the get go, but RSWiki has shafted me at times

  9. Hey thanks! The only reason the pickaxe choice is added in the GUI is so that I can grab the identifier. I am currently working on it being able to go and fix a broken pickaxe. Having the player choose at the start makes this a lot easier!

     

    Working on a Nightmare zone one just now but I'll go back and finish this up tomorrow!

    Yeah it can definitely be tricky the first time around! After that it becomes much easier! Does OSRS even have the random event that causes broken pickaxes anymore?

  10. Could be a poorly written script. I can tell you that the client runs fairly well with one bot and shouldn't be consuming 80% under normal conditions. Try a different script (or two).

    Agreed, especially since this doesn't look like its running mirror mode either (which takes up more CPU). It has to be the script for sure!

     

    If this ever happens when I'm writing my own scripts, I revert to older version of script and see if CPU usage is still high under same conditions, or I turn newer pieces of code in script into comments until I narrow down what is exactly taking up so much more CPU.

    /*multi line comment */
  11. I think the main anti-ban is a flawless scripts overall. Other than that you could try playing legit for awhile and take notice of any little actions you may make, like how often you tend to move the camera, if you right click random players while you're fishing and bored, misclicks, ect. Just don't add these to a set pattern that can easily be picked up. You could also change up the play style in terms of activeness on random. So maybe like 30 min you're really "active" and right clicking players and stupid shit (I honestly do this a lot when playing legit with undivided attention), and then switch to not doing much other than the clicks required to fish and bank. So I guess mainly just don't make a pattern easily detectable and switch things up every so often.

  12. Reading over scripts and coaching each scripter on what's needed to get accepted is very time consuming. I have no problem instantly denying scripts if you want me to move over to that model.

    Understandable, plus y'all probably get a lot of requests that are already on the SDN, but they think theirs is better and try pushing it.

     

    Instead of SDN requests are you guys just going to go based on free/local scripts until they are used/popular enough to determine whether or not they should be reviewed to be put on the SDN?

  13. I was just wondering if there was a better way to detect if i am in combat because when using if(myPlayer().isincombat) it will detect it most of the time but if i am not getting attacked ,like if i was in a safe spot, than it doest really work that well. 

    If you found out could you PM me or comment back on this post ? Would be much appreciated, I'm having the same problem and have been trying to fix it all together for awhile now

  14. So I made a simple and short script a few hrs ago, it was running perfectly. No bugs nada. Now I added a paint, and then ran it again and it'll bank when the banking condition is met but when the others are it just sits and gives this error:

    [ERROR][Bot #1][06/08 04:44:12 PM]: Error in bot executor!
    java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.osbot.QA
    	at org.osbot.Lpt7.IiiiiiiIIiII(nl:227)
    	at org.osbot.Lpt7.IiiiiiiIIiII(nl:131)
    	at org.osbot.kB.IiiiiiiIIiII(pj:102)
    	at org.osbot.rs07.event.WebWalkEvent.execute(ki:92)
    	at org.osbot.rs07.event.EventExecutor$2.run(mi:73)
    	at org.osbot.rs07.event.EventExecutor.execute(mi:24)
    	at org.osbot.rs07.script.MethodProvider.execute(aj:461)
    	at org.osbot.rs07.api.Walking.webWalk(yo:256)
    	at FlaxSpinner.onLoop(FlaxSpinner.java:67)
    	at org.osbot.rs07.event.ScriptExecutor$InternalExecutor.run(hj:81)
    	at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
    
    

    I can PM someone the code if they want to see, but I don't believe there's any errors. Don't wanna post it here public cause its for a friend.

    From my understanding this means Webwalking didn't get installed correctly when updating to newer version of Osbot. If so, I usually fix this by deleting newest version of osbot and download newest version from an older version of Osbot I have on my computer still, or from this site directly. I do remember neither of those worked once and I ended up having to delete my entire Osbot folder saved on my computer, then downloading the client again after that, but that for sure did the trick for me on my tower computer a few days ago.

     

    It only says error at FlaxSpinner.onLoop(FlaxSpinner.java67) because that is where you used walking api (which isn't installed correctly with your client)

    • Like 1
  15. As he has stated above, use widget debugger to find a widget ID that pertains specifically to the box that you intend on the bot to type in. So that way if the widget is not visible or is null then it will not type until it is visible or !null.

     

    For example:

    if (widgets.get(162, 32) !=null && widgets.get(162, 32).isVisible()) {
          keyboard.typeString("28");
       }
  16. Responsive talking bots would work wonders for not getting reported. I remember Devients Woodcutter(was free too) back in the day would have various responses to say hello(only if somebody else had initiated the greeting) and would also say woodcut level if asked and ask theirs after. Ofc this had a way to detect if it was the same person trying to get it to say hi or level so it would stop after replying to the dialouge after one response per player.(maybe the timer for an indiv player would reset after 30 min or so).

     

    Thing was so dope.

     

    As for checking exps every so often... I used to do that nonstop at times when I would play legit, but other times wouldnt check for hours

  17. Very nice! - Sorry that I keep on complaining about a few things, but whenever I do not enter a pin (I don't have one) - It fails to startup a new bot. Whenever I put in 1234 for example, it loads up. I think this is the same error with the name spacing, that it specifically requires a pin. Example:

     

    When you type user:pass 

     

    It fails to load the bot, it prompts me with a usage command of how to use the line.

     

    On the other hand, when you type user:pass:1234 

     

    It loads up the bot, without problems. 

     

    Could you look into this?

    None of my accounts have pins, but whenever I add/save a new account, on osbot startup, it adds a pin to my account. Just needs some data entered, and if you don't even have a pin then it won't ever need to pull this info anyways. So don't put any worry on the pin data unless you actually have one in the game.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...