Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/16/18 in all areas

  1. β™”CzarScripts #1 Bots β™” Proven the #1 selling, most users, most replies Script Series on the market. Big THANK YOU to all our wonderful users and supporters over the 8 years, we couldn't have done it without you. Czar Bots have always been the Best and the most Feature-rich bots available with the most total sales in OSBot history. Come and find out why everyone is choosing Czar Bots today. β™” LATEST BOTS β™” If you want a trial - just post the script name and it will be activated after I hit 'like' on your post Requirements: hit 'like' on this thread
    2 points
  2. @Luke Reading Just keep track of the percentage changed / number of decrease price clicks. For example: final int targetPercentageChanged = -10; execute(new Event() { int percentageChanged = 0; @Override public int execute() throws InterruptedException { if (percentageChanged != targetPercentageChanged) { if (targetPercentageChanged < 0) { if (lower5PercentWidget.interact()) { percentageChanged -= 5; } else if (higher5PercentWidget.interact()) { percentageChanged += 5; } } } else if (getGrandExchange().confirm()) { setFinished(); } return 600; } });
    2 points
  3. 'the intelligent choice' By @Czar CURRENT RECORD: 201 HOURS Lifetime updates and support, request a feature either on the main thread or on our active discord! For advice and strategies, join our discord! You can also purchase the bot with GP if you'd like. 84 HOUR PROGRESS ON A LEVEL 20 ACCOUNT Suicided account with mirror mode near rock crabs, 81 mining! I will probably go for 99 Mine 1 drop 1 item drop pre-hover feature: (it's faster in the actual update)
    1 point
  4. Molly's Chaos Druids This script fights chaos druids in Taverly dungeon, Edgeville dungeon and Ardougne. Profits can easily exceed 200k p/h and 60k combat exp/ph, this is a great method for training low level accounts and pures. Buy HERE Like this post and then post on this thread requesting a 24hr trial. When I have given you a trial I will like your post so you will receive a notification letting you know you got a trial. Requirements - 46 Thieving for Ardougne -82 Thieving and a Lockpick for Yanille - 5 Agility for Taverly(recommended) - No other requirements! Though I do recommend combat stats of 20+ as a minimum Features: - Supports eating any food - Hopping out of bot worlds - Recovers from deaths(respawn point must be lumbridge), includes re-equipping items on death - Potion support - Automatically detects and withdraws/uses Falador teleport tabs if using Taverly dungeon - Automatically detects and withdraws/equips/uses glories if using Edgeville dungeon - Supports looting bag Setup: Start the script, fill out the GUI, and be in the general area of where you want to run the script. CLI setup: Proggies: In the works: Known bugs: Bug report form, this is a MUST for problems to be resolved quickly: Description of bug(where, what, when, why): Log: Your settings: Mirror mode: Y/N
    1 point
  5. Hi all, Hope all is well. In the last two months I've been botting OSRS pretty extensively as I've been in-between jobs (left old role for a new role set to start in September) and found myself with a lot of free time. I consider myself to be analytical and I always make a conscious effort to keep my biases in check. In these last few months, I've gathered quite a few insights regarding how Jagex's anti-cheat team operates, which I believe to be accurate and would like to share them with all of you today. To be clear, I have no direct line of contact to anyone working on the anti-cheat team so these are just conclusions I've drawn based on my personal experiences & those of fellow botters. My analysis will only pertain to bans issued manually to accounts that have purchased a membership and are highly diversified (NOT goldfarming) as I have no experience running F2P/P2P botfarms. Those are almost certainly handled by a different stream (RE: Botwatch). *** "Manual Ban" does not refer to a mod teleporting next to you and banning you in-game, but rather someone on the anti-cheat team screening your account (from a log of hundreds - thousands) and making a judgement call as to whether you've broken any rules *** 1) All bans issued on diversified/rested accounts with membership (questing, different skills etc) and don't goldfarm are due to manual reviews by someone on the anti-cheat team 2) The only way for a botted account (that satisfies the conditions above ) to survive is to avoid a manual review at all costs 3) The single most important factor in regards to triggering a manual review is total time online (I've found this figure to be ~12 hours) Total time online INCLUDES the time you spend playing legitimately on the account. ie: if you bot for 10 hours and play legitimately for 4 hours you WILL VERY LIKELY trigger a manual review Once your account gets reviewed, the entire history of your account is available to the anti-cheat team thus any kind of botting that you've done (no matter how long ago) is liable to lead to a ban An account that survives a manual review is not a reflection of the botters knowledge/prowess but the incompetence of the anti-cheat specialist reviewing your account False positives are 100% real as are false negatives (bots that fly under the radar). For evidence on false positives (incorrectly banned accounts) you can do a quick search on google and find mod tweets directly contradicting each other regarding whether the ban was accurate or not I've successfully appealed botted accounts that were played on only 1 IP address that were permanently banned for macroing major. Their response was something along the lines of "we identified unauthorized access to your account" (100% false / impossible). This confirms that bans are at the discretion of a judgement call that the anti-cheat specialist reviewing your account makes. The accounts that were appealed were highly diversified in tasks (quests, combat, skilling, clue scrolls, favour, mini games etc), and botted specific skills up to 4 hours consecutively (20 minute breaks per hour botted) 4) Avoiding hotspots for manual reviews is 100% key to not getting banned. Example of hotspots that are guaranteed to cause a manual review: runecrafting 1h+, Zulrah etc. Even if you do Zulrah or runecrafting legitimately for extended periods of time, your account will be manually reviewed. To reiterate point 3), any kind of botting history will be available to the anti-cheat specialist reviewing your account 5) The primary mandate of the anti-cheat team is to eliminate gold farming & real world trading. These are the primary forms of botting that directly impact Jagex's bottomline and as a [Chinese] financial sponsor owned company, you can be damn sure that is their #1 priority It is my belief that accounts with large amounts of wealth on them (100M+) are subject to more frequent manual reviews when flagged. This is because banning the account becomes a double whammy for Jagex 6) "Anti-Cheat specialists" are NOT data scientists, but regular customer support staff that are trained in that respect. Thus, it is my belief that in their training they are given relatively specific guidelines to follow to identify whether an account is botting or not. It is reasonable to assume that these guidelines are set in accordance to the most popular botting scripts & botted skills This explains why accounts that exploit an unpopular gold farming mechanic through private scripts have very low ban-rates. I personally have botted several accounts using such a script that has crashed very obviously (clicking the same spot for hours due to lack of failsafe) and ALL of them have survived. It is not unreasonable to assume that because of the sheer quantity of data collected on each account, the data scientists will only send a SELECTION of logs to the anti-cheat specialist to review (ie: hey John, please review the following woodcutting/agility logs on account X for the past week) It is my belief that the anti-cheat team is occasionally given unique mandates to follow through on (the recent NMZ banwave is a clear example in my opinion). This falls in line with them pursuing their primary mandate of keeping goldfarmers in check as Zulrah is one of the most efficient gold-farming mechanics in the game and accounts are being farmed EN MASSE to exploit it 7) Many people have reported a substantial improvement in ban rates when using mirror-mode instead of injection. This is a highly controversial topic because Osbot claims injection to be indistinguishable from other third party clients. Personally, I believe this to be unlikely because there have been many reports of tutorial accounts getting instantly locked when logging in from the injection client whereas the normal client logs in fine. Additionally, OSBuddy is confirmed to return a signature to Jagex that identifies it specifically as OSBuddy. It is not unlikely to think Runelite has done the same (I haven't found official evidence of this however) because it would be in the best interest of the owners of these clients to just play ball with Jagex. This, in turn, would make it very easy for the anti-cheat team to flag unidentified third-party clients for high priority review. It is important to stress that although mirror-mode appears to be the safer alternative, it is only one of the many factors Jagex uses to identify bots. If you don't bot responsibly, your account will get flagged all the same due to the aforementioned reasons in points 1 through 6. Concluding thoughts: Although avoiding bans will likely never be an exact science, I think we can make some progress by simply sharing bans we've recently experienced. In my short time here, I've noticed a famine mentality as relates to protocols & best practices to avoid bans. Although I understand why someone who relies on OSRS botting to put food on the table would want to keep to themselves, this attitude is clearly counter-productive to the advancement of botting as a whole. I will be starting my new role in less than 2 weeks and will not be doing much botting anymore, so I wanted to leave you guys with what I learned in hopes to start a collaborative discussion moving forward. Ban Report Example: Client: Mirror Time online the day leading to a ban: 12 hours Activit(es) botted leading to a ban: NMZ/ gold farming technique/ Woodcutting etc. Age of account: days, weeks, months, years etc. Alek's response to this thread: Best, Logicfury P.S. I will try my best to update the thread with any & all well thought-out insights (contradictory or supporting) and give credit where it is due
    1 point
  6. I've missed you CS:GO n shizzles
    1 point
  7. Thx for this! Script updated to V1.17: - Added more food (See above) Will be online in a few hours Khaleesi
    1 point
  8. http://oldschoolrunescape.wikia.com/wiki/Money_making_guide Don't say I never did anything for you.
    1 point
  9. Can i get trial?. My spinning script is dead, and if it works correctly, I'll buy it
    1 point
  10. You guys remember when it was muffins/scotty/zerker/decode/jackshow/ and like 30+ randoms just trolling dbuffed? It'll be that all over again LOL
    1 point
  11. Hey, This is an option in the client settings menu for this -Apa
    1 point
  12. im interested in buying this script, can I try it out first please ?
    1 point
  13. No script is totally protected from bans. It comes down to the user managing the bot. It's important to be aware of your botting habits and the status of your scripts you choose to use. If there's something that sticks out to be an issue, these threads are here for you to communicate with the scripter to improve it. Instead of ignoring the issue you were aware of, and blaming the script for your ban. That's all on you.
    1 point
  14. 1 point
  15. If i remember correctly, when you select the randomise button, your current break time will be randomised by +-10%. So: Enter your interval durations Select the randomise button
    1 point
  16. someone help this poor man already!
    1 point
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...